Despite an important match against Norwich coming up on
Saturday, it’s natural that, with less than a week to go, thoughts are
already starting to turn towards the momentous, nerve-shredding second
leg against Real Madrid. Sir Alex was in Spain two nights ago to watch
them impressively beat Barcelona 3-1, and he will be giving next week’s
game serious thought to ensure United fare better than the Catalan
giants.
Leading up to the first encounter, we only had a vague idea of what
to expect. We probably knew how Madrid would play, utilising a style and
formation that’s well established, but United surprised a few with the
inclusion of Danny Welbeck on the wing, Phil Jones in midfield (although
we had been given a taster of this), and Wayne Rooney on the right-hand
side.
Now it’s different. Ninety minutes in and both managers have shown
their hands. With both sides claiming to be satisfied with their night’s
work after the first match, it will be fascinating to see how they
approach the second and decisive leg.
Considering the result, the performance, and the fact United created
several good chances other than the goal (let’s hope they don’t haunt
us), it would make some sense to continue in the same manner; with the
same team and the same approach (fitness permitting). Saying that, there
are various factors to consider, and lessons to be learned from the
game at the Bernabeu.
Team selection will probably consume the bulk of Sir Alex’s thoughts,
and it would be a surprise if there were significant changes. Vidic was
reported to have missed out on the first leg purely because it was felt
he may struggle after playing just three days previously. Of course,
Sir Alex did not have to play Vidic against Everton and I believe he
made his choice that Evans and Rio would be his pairing at the Bernabeu
when considering his team to play Everton. I’m not sure Vidic will get
the nod this time either – for all of the Serbian’s commanding
qualities, Evans looks sharp and does provide additional pace; an asset
which may be crucial considering Madrid will aim to play largely on the
counter.
Straight after the first leg, I heard a few claims for Smalling to
replace Rafeal, but even accounting for his rashness in the first half,
he displayed a maturity and resilience after the break (particularly in
light of the fact he had been booked), a point noted by Sir Alex.
Following his match-winning performance at QPR last weekend, he looks
certain to play.
Jones and Carrick, even though they were often outnumbered with Ozil
dropping deep, combined impressively in midfield. Jones, in particular,
provided the strength and tenacity we have often been lacking in these
games, and, as long as he’s fit, it would seem unlikely there will be
any changes in the centre.
The only obvious doubt is Kagawa. Welbeck was so effective during the
first leg he has switched from ‘unlikely starter’ to ‘very probable’
with just one performance, while our Japanese international struggled. I
wrote last week that he appeared a little weak physically and was
unable to impress himself upon the game. The likely move would be to
replace with him Nani, Young, Cleverley or Valencia.
However, we bought Kagawa with Europe in mind and we shouldn’t
dismiss him from this tie just yet. The main problem at the Bernabeu was
that he often received the ball with his back to goal, surrounded by
uncompromising defenders, a role suited to a Drogba-type figure rather
than a diminutive creative forward. At home, with Madrid sitting deeper,
our offensive players will mostly be in possession facing the goal,
seeking to penetrate the Spanish team’s defence. Bearing in mind how the
game may pan out, he remains worthy of consideration.
A further issue is the deployment of Rooney. Shunned out to the
right, he worked hard but now he needs to be afforded greater capacity
to harm Madrid. Starting from the right wing and tracking back is hardly
likely to see him do that: a more central role surely beckons. If, as
seems to be universally accepted, Madrid grab an away goal, we need to
score at least twice to win outright and so our most likely goal-scorers
must be prominent in our attack. If this does happen, the role of
Kagawa, if selected, would require further thought. A further dilemma
comes from Nani, who has played well in the last two games and could
force his way into the side.
I imagine Sir Alex will consider his defensive tactics for some time.
Madrid operate with an attacking trio of Ronaldo, Ozil and Di Maria who
freely switch positions throughout the game. At the Bernabeu, Sir Alex
asked his defenders to follow their man, causing Rafeal and Evra to
drift inside at times, tightening up the central area but leaving space
on the flanks. This was most evident in the second half when Madrid had
significant joy attacking down the left with Evra tucked in. Thankfully,
it brought no reward, but it is not something we should encourage
again. It would make more sense for our defenders to maintain their
positions and trust that the players will deal with their opponent when
they drift into their area of the pitch.
The scoreline presents an interesting challenge for Sir Alex, in
terms of how attacking he should instruct United to play. I doubt any
United fan is suggesting we attempt a nil-nil draw, not unless they have
nerves of steel and enjoy casual torture. At Old Trafford, we often aim
to obliterate teams, but surely such a swashbuckling style would allow
too much room for Madrid to spring their counter-attacks.
With this in mind, I would like to see us adopt an attacking stance,
aiming to maintain possession and continually push into the final third,
but balanced with a sense of control and containment. Madrid are
renowned for rapier counters, especially with Ronaldo, and the inclusion
of Phil Jones alongside a deep-lying Carrick suggests a safety-net of
some description will be sought.
Ronaldo was devastating in the first half: running past defenders at
will, causing panic in the box whenever he had it, and was the fulcrum
of all their attacks. He was subdued in the second half, however, so
much so that Ozil and Di Maria were arguably bigger threats over the
ninety minutes. The way we defended against Ronaldo in the second half –
getting tighter, compressing space, frustrating him – is something we
must repeat from the start next time. In fact, we must press better all
over the pitch than we did in the first half.
One aspect in which we disappointed in the first game was set-pieces.
Madrid have been woeful all season at defending corners and free-kicks,
and following Welbeck’s goal – which, though he took it very well, was
incredibly straight-forward – we never threatened enough again. Van
Persie, who has provided excellent delivery all season, often hit
corners too high and too long during the game, and left us little chance
to create problems. If he can find his usual delivery, it could be a
crucial part of the match.
Both managers expressed equal satisfaction with the result and the
performance after the first leg, but with a home tie to come, I feel
this tie is (just about) in United’s favour. When away goals come into
play, it changes the perspective, and tends to make it a more tactical
battle. But, with a nil-nil very unlikely and another one-one draw
taking us towards dreaded extra time, the current score-line makes
United’s objective seem as simple as possible: win the game.
Now if only it actually was that simple….
No comments:
Post a Comment